Self-harm now takes more lives than war, murder and natural causes combined. Why are we killing ourselves and how can we stop it? By Tony Dokoupil
WHEN THOMAS Joiner was 25 years old, his father—whose
name was also Thomas Joiner and who could do anything—disappeared from
the family’s home. At the time, Joiner was a graduate student at the
University of Texas, studying clinical psychology. His focus was
depression, and it was obvious to him that his father was depressed. Six
weeks earlier, on a family trip to the Georgia coast, the gregarious
56-year-old—the kind of guy who was forever talking and laughing and
bending people his way—was sullen and withdrawn, spending days in bed,
not sick or hungover, not really sleeping.
Joiner knew enough not
to worry. He knew that the desire for death—the easy way out, the only
relief—was a symptom of depression, and although at least 2 percent of
those diagnosed make suicide their final chart line, his father didn’t
match the suicidal types he had learned about in school. He wasn’t weak
or impulsive. He wasn’t a brittle person with bad genes and big
problems. Suicide was understood to be for losers, basically, the exact
opposite of men like Thomas Joiner Sr.—a successful businessman, a
former Marine, tough even by Southern standards.
But Dad had left an unmade bed in a spare room, and an empty spot
where his van usually went. By nightfall he hadn’t been heard from, and
the following morning Joiner’s mother called him at school. The police
had found the van. It was parked in an office lot about a mile from the
house, the engine cold. Inside, in the back, the police found Joiner’s
father dead, covered in blood. He had been stabbed through the heart.
The
investigators found slash marks on his father’s wrists and a note on a
yellow sticky pad by the driver’s seat. “Is this the answer?” it read,
in his father’s shaky scrawl. They ruled it a suicide, death by
“puncture wound,” an impossibly grisly way to go, which made it all the
more difficult for Joiner to understand. This didn’t seem like the easy
way out.
Back home for the funeral, Joiner’s pain and confusion
were compounded by ancient taboos. For centuries suicide was considered
an act against God, a violation of law, and a stain on the community. He
overheard one relative advise another to call it a heart attack. His
girlfriend fretted about his tainted DNA. Even some of his peers and
professors—highly trained, doctoral-level clinicians—failed to offer a
simple “my condolences.” It was as though the Joiner family had failed
dear old Dad, killed him somehow, just as surely as if they had stabbed
him themselves. To Joiner, however, the only real failing was from his
field, which clearly had a shaky understanding of suicide.
Survivors of a suicide are haunted by the same whys and hows, the
what-ifs that can never be answered. Joiner was no different. He wanted
to know why people die at their own hands: What makes them desire death
in the first place? When exactly do they decide to end their lives? How
do they build up the nerve to do it? But unlike most other survivors of
suicide, for the last two decades he has been developing answers.
Joiner
is 47 now, and a chaired professor at Florida State University, in
Tallahassee. Physically, he is an imposing figure, 6-foot-3 with a
lantern jaw and a head shaved clean with a razor. He wears an off-and-on
beard, which grows in as heavy as iron filings. The look fits his work,
which is dedicated to interrogating suicide as hard as anyone ever has,
to finally understand it as a matter of public good and personal duty.
He hopes to honor his father, by combating what killed him and by making
his death a stepping stone to better treatment. “Because,” as he says,
“no one should have to die alone in a mess in a hotel bathroom, in the
back of a van, or on a park bench, thinking incorrectly that the world
will be better off.”
He is the author of the first comprehensive
theory of suicide, an explanation, as he told me, “for all suicides at
all times in all cultures across all conditions.” He also has much more
than a theory: he has a moment. This spring, suicide news paraded down
America’s front pages and social-media feeds, led by a report from the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which called self-harm “an
increasing public health concern.” Although the CDC revealed grabby
figures—like the fact that there are more deaths by suicide than by road
accident—the effort prompted only a tired spasm of talk about aging
baby boomers and life in a recession. The CDC itself, in an editorial
note, suggested that the party would rock on once the economy rebounded
and our Dennis Hopper–cohort rode its hog into the sunset.
The world has lost many beloved public figures to suicide. Writer Virginia Woolf (d. March 28, 1941).
Writer David Foster Wallace (d. September 12, 2008).
Singer Mindy McCready (d. February 17, 2013).
Artist Mark Rothko (d. February 25, 1970).
But
suicide is not an economic problem or a generational tic. It’s not a
secondary concern, a sideline that will solve itself with new jobs, less
access to guns, or a more tolerant society, although all would be
welcome. It’s a problem with a broad base and terrible momentum, a
result of seismic changes in the way we live and a corresponding shift
in the way we die—not only in America but around the world.
We
know, thanks to a growing body of research on suicide and the conditions
that accompany it, that more and more of us are living through a time
of seamless black: a period of mounting clinical depression, blossoming
thoughts of oblivion and an abiding wish to get there by the nonscenic
route. Every year since 1999, more Americans have killed themselves than
the year before, making suicide the nation’s greatest untamed cause of
death. In much of the world, it’s among the only major threats to get
significantly worse in this century than in the last.
The result
is an accelerating paradox. Over the last five decades, millions of
lives have been remade for the better. Yet within this brighter
tomorrow, we suffer unprecedented despair. In a time defined by ever
more social progress and astounding innovations, we have never been more
burdened by sadness or more consumed by self-harm. And this may be only
the beginning. If Joiner and others are right—and a landmark collection
of studies suggests they are—we’ve reached the end of one order of
human history and are at the beginning of a new order entirely, one
beset by a whole lot of self-inflicted bloodshed, and a whole lot more
to come.
THE RISE of suicide in the U.S. has been slow enough
to sneak up on people. I realized this just the other day, on the phone
with Catherine Barber, who directs the Means Matter Campaign, a
suicide-prevention program at Harvard. A decade ago, she led the team
that designed the National Violent Death Reporting System, a key source
of federal data on premature exits. Because she’s now focused on
education and prevention, not data mining, it had been a few years since
she looked at national numbers, so we logged on together.
We
selected suicide from a drop-down menu of violent injuries that also
included accidents, murder, and war, and we clicked send. Our screens
blinked—hers in Boston, mine in New York—and up popped a simple
black-and-white chart. The world’s most depressing spreadsheet. There
are as many intentional ways to die as there are people to imagine them,
and we saw more of all of them: an almost 20 percent rise in the annual
suicide rate, a 30 percent jump in the sheer number of people who died,
at least 400,000 casualties in a decade—about the same toll as World
War II and Korea combined.
We saw more jumping and shooting,
poisoning and stabbing, drowning, and strangulation. We even saw more
death by “unspecified means,” a catch-all column for the most inventive
forms of self-destruction—the swan dives into lava, the encounters with
farm equipment. As she scrolled through the woe, Barber began to mutter
to herself: “Oh, shoot ... yeah, that’s no good ... the increase is
across all methods ... dang.”
This year, America is likely to
reach a grim milestone: the 40,000th death by suicide, the highest
annual total on record, and one reached years ahead of what would be
expected by population growth alone. We blew past an even bigger
milestone revealed in November, when a study lead by Ian Rockett, an
epidemiologist at West Virginia University, showed that suicide had
become the leading cause of “injury death” in America. As the CDC noted
again this spring, suicide outpaces the rate of death on the road—and
for that matter anywhere else people accidentally harm themselves.
Somewhere Ralph Nader is smiling, but the takeaway is darkly profound:
we’ve become our own greatest danger.
This development evades
simple explanation. The shift in suicides began long before the
recession, for example, and although the changes accelerated after 2007,
when the unemployment rate began to rise, no more than a quarter of
those new suicides have been tied to joblessness, according to
researchers. Guns aren’t all to blame either, since the suicide rate has
grown even as the portion of suicides by firearm has remained stable.
The fact is, self-harm has become a worldwide concern. This emerged in the new Global Burden of Disease report, published in The Lancet
this past December. It’s the largest ever effort to document what ails,
injures, and exterminates the species. But allow me to save you the
reading. Humankind’s biggest health problem is humankind.
The coordinating center for the GBD, the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, provided Newsweek
with custom data that bears this out in dramatic fashion. At first
glance, the numbers seem to be uniformly good news. The suicide rate—the
number of people per 100,000 who killed themselves each year—dropped in
developed countries between 1990 to 2010 and grew only slightly
overall. But these age-adjusted good tidings mask considerable trauma in
the population at large.
In the developed world, suicide became the leading cause of death in 2010 for people ages 15-49.
Throughout
the developed world, for example, self-harm is now the leading cause of
death for people 15 to 49, surpassing all cancers and heart disease.
That’s a dizzying change, a milestone that shows just how effective we
are at fighting disease, and just how haunted we remain at the same
time. Around the world, in 2010 self-harm took more lives than war,
murder, and natural disasters combined, stealing more than 36 million
years of healthy life across all ages. In more advanced countries, only
three diseases on the planet do more harm.
No comments:
Post a Comment