Assessment
Patients who are suicidal require careful
assessment (see Table 7). In the assessment of suicide, it is important
to recognize that the risk of suicide increases if the patient reports
ideation (i.e., thoughts of suicide) plus a plan (i.e., description of
the means). Risk continues to increase to the extent that the plan is
lethal. Lethality is determined by an assessment of how likely death
would follow, if the reported plan were carried out. Factors to consider
in assessing lethality include availability of the means, reversibility
of the means (once begun can it be stopped), and proximity to help. In
the cancer patient reporting suicidal ideation, it is essential to
determine whether the underlying cause is a depressive illness or an
expression of the desire to have ultimate control over intolerable
symptoms.[1] Prompt identification and treatment of major depression is essential in lowering the risk for suicide in cancer patients. Risk factors, particularly hopelessness (which is an even stronger predictive factor for suicide than is depression) should be carefully assessed.[2]
The assessment of hopelessness is not straightforward in the patient
with advanced disease with no hope of cure. It is important to assess
the underlying reasons for hopelessness, which may be related to poor
symptom management, fears of painful death, or feelings of abandonment.[3]
Of 220 Japanese patients who had cancer and who were diagnosed with
major depression after being referred for psychiatric consultation,
approximately 50% reported suicidal
ideation. In a retrospective analysis of predictors of suicidal
ideation, researchers found that those with more symptoms of major
depression and poorer physical functioning were significantly more
likely to report suicidal ideation.[4]
Establishing
rapport is of prime importance in working with suicidal cancer patients
as it serves as the foundation for other interventions. The clinician
must believe that talking about suicide will not cause the patient to
attempt suicide. On the contrary, talking about suicide legitimizes this
concern and permits patients to describe their feelings and fears,
providing a sense of control.[5]
A supportive therapeutic relationship should be maintained, which
conveys the attitude that much can be done to alleviate emotional and
physical pain. (Refer to the PDQ summary on Pain for more information.) A
crisis intervention-oriented psychotherapeutic approach should be
initiated that mobilizes as much of a patient's support system as
possible. Contributing symptoms (e.g., pain) should be aggressively
controlled and depression, psychosis, agitation, and underlying causes
of delirium should be treated.[5]
(Refer to the PDQ summary on Cognitive Disorders and Delirium for more
information.) These problems are most frequently managed in the medical
hospital or at home. Although uncommon, psychiatric hospitalization can
be helpful when there is a clear indication and the patient is medically
stable.[5]
No comments:
Post a Comment