But he does not appear to
have a history of abnormal aggression or psychopathic tendencies linked
to "rage-type murders in intimate relations," they found.
The conclusions, read at
the athlete's murder trial on Wednesday, are a "slam-dunk for the
defense," CNN legal expert Kelly Phelps said.
Pistorius loved Steenkamp, agent says
Pistorius begins mental evaluation
Photos: Oscar Pistorius murder trial
Pistorius begins mental evaluation
The double amputee sprinter is on trial for killing his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp in his home last year.
He admits killing her but says he mistook her for a burglar and thought he was defending himself.
The prosecution says the two had an argument and he killed her intentionally.
The psychiatric report seemed to suggest that Pistorius's version of events was plausible.
"When Mr. Pistorius's
appraisal of the situation is that he might be physically threatened, a
fear response follows that might seem extraordinary when viewed from the
perspective of a normal bodied person, but normal in the context of a
disabled person with his history," the doctors found.
One of the questions
Judge Thokozile Masipa must consider in determining her verdict is
whether Pistorius behaved reasonably in the circumstances.
Several witnesses have
testified that Pistorius tends to arm himself and go towards danger,
rather than away from it, when he thinks he is under threat.
The track star's specialist sports doctor testified Wednesday after defense lawyer Barry Roux read the mental health report.
Wayne Derman said that Pistorius was "hypervigilant."
Mentally sound
The trial restarted
Monday after a monthlong break when Pistorius was evaluated by mental
health experts at the prosecution's request.
Pistorius evidence revealed
How will Pistorius evaluation play out?
Pistorius trial on hold for mental exams
They found he was not mentally incapacitated when he shot and killed Steenkamp.
An independent panel of
doctors said that Pistorius was, at the time he shot Steenkamp, not
mentally ill or incapacitated in any way that would make him "criminally
not responsible of the offenses charged."
The report added that "Mr. Pistorius was capable of appreciating the wrongfulness of his act."
Had the doctors deemed
Pistorius mentally incapacitated during the shooting, the trial would
have immediately ended in a verdict of not guilty by reason of mental
illness.
Verdict
At the trial's
conclusion, Judge Masipa will have to decide whether Pistorius genuinely
made a mistake or killed Steenkamp intentionally.
If she does not believe
the athlete thought there was an intruder, she will find him guilty of
murder and sentence him to a prison term ranging from 15 years to life.
South Africa does not have the death penalty.
If Masipa accepts that
Pistorius did not know Steenkamp was the person he was shooting at, she
could find him guilty of culpable homicide, a lesser charge than murder,
or acquit him, according to CNN legal analyst Kelly Phelps.
A verdict of culpable homicide would leave the sentence at Masipa's discretion.
No comments:
Post a Comment